Monday, March 7, 2016 - Tuesday, March 8, 2016       Events

Recap: SPARC Meeting on Openness in Research & Education

March 7-8, 2016  ·  Hyatt Regency San Antonio Riverwalk Open Access   ·   Open Data   ·   Open Education

The 2016 SPARC MORE Conference brought together a diverse array of perspectives to work on every aspect of creating a system that serves scholarship, disseminates knowledge, and feeds the public good. Speakers included representatives from a preeminent private foundation, university presidents, young researchers, new faculty, librarians, and technical staff - all part of a dedicated community working to set the default to open.

Location

Hyatt Regency San Antonio Riverwalk
123 Losoya Street
San Antonio, TX 78205

Date

Monday, March 7th, 2016

Time

March 7-8, 2016


The 2016 SPARC MORE Conference brought together a diverse array of perspectives to work on every aspect of creating a system that serves scholarship, disseminates knowledge, and feeds the public good. Speakers included representatives from a preeminent private foundation, university presidents, young researchers, new faculty, librarians, and technical staff - all part of a dedicated community working to set the default to open.

Those gathered at the March 7-9 conference were both “unabashedly idealistic” and “relentlessly pragmatic” about open access, open data, and open educational resources, said SPARC Executive Director Heather Joseph at the closing session in San Antonio. Participants were encouraged to think about the outcomes that they wanted to achieve through advocating for open access (and open data, and OER), and to consider open as a strategy to help the community solve big problems, and capitalize on new opportunities. Rather than simply advocating “open” as the end game, discussions centered around the importance of effectively finishing the sentence “open in order to….” (i.e., opening up access to textbook in order to make college more affordable; or opening access to data in order to prevent the Zika virus from fueling a pandemic…).

As you work to turn your passion for open into action, here are some highlights and takeaways from the SPARC MORE 2016 Conference:

  1. Video recordings of all SPARC MORE sessions can be found on SPARC's YouTube channel
  2. Gates Foundation embraces Open and raises the bar for others
  3. What university leaders can do to promote Open & how librarians can help
  4. Moving books into Open Access
  5. Early Career Researchers Forge New Paths to Advocate for Open
  6. The Open Agenda and new faculty: Connecting early
  7. Workshop: Improving Campus Open Access Policies
  8. SPARC 2014: A transformative experience
  9. SPARC Africa: Building on a shared culture
  10. Photos from MORE Meeting

2016 SPARC MORE Meeting Sponsors

SPARC is incredibly thankful for the generous support of our MORE Meeting sponsors:

Wi-Fi Sponsor
PLOS logo

Luncheon/Reception Sponsors

bepress logo   Microsoft-logo_rgb_c-gray

Showcase Sponsors

SYMPLECTIC-Red-Black-Light-Small (1)    eprints logo        figshare-logo

Supporting Organizations

Overleaf logo     AtMire logo    ACRL LOGO      duraspace_logo_1in

 

Program Committee

The SPARC MORE Program Committee includes: Heather Joseph (SPARC), Jean-Gabriel Bankier (bepress), Joni Blake (Greater Western Library Association), Amy Buckland (University of Chicago), David Ernst (University of Minnesota), Rupert Gatti (Open Book Publishers), Diane Graves (Trinity University), Debra Kurtz (DuraSpace), Erin McKiernan (Wilfrid Laurier University), Emma Molls (Iowa State University), William Nixon (University of Glasgow), Donna Okubo (PLOS), Kostas Repanas (Agency for Science, Technology & Research), Jeff Spies (Center for Open Science), Jennifer Sturdy (Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in Social Sciences), Shan Sutton (University of Arizona), Greg Tananbaum (SPARC), Lee VanOrsdel (Grand Valley State University), Alex Wade (Microsoft Research), Kelsey Wiens (Creative Commons South Africa).

Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

SPARC Innovator Award

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data   ·   Open Education

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

From Ideas to Industries: Human Genome Project

  ·   Open Data

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

Openness as a Career Asset: Erin McKiernan

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

“The Right to Read is the Right to Mine…”

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


“The Right to Read is the Right to Mine…”

Those words are not only the tagline for an innovative text and data mining project called ContentMine, but are also a crucial component of the definition of Open Access.

The facts contained in scholarly articles are what make them so useful and so valuable. Researchers recognize that the digital environment gives them the opportunity to use these articles, and to make sense of these facts in entirely new ways. They want, and need, the ability to fully use these articles – to freely download and search, text mine, data mine, compute on and crawl them as data – in order to advance their work, to discover, to innovate.

Digital articles are, after all, simply small-scale aggregations of digital data. So it makes sense to empower users to employ the tools that are most appropriate to solving the problem at hand. Yet increasingly, we are seeing troubling signs that many commercial publishers are unwilling to support users who want to actually use the content in scholarly articles and not simply read the content in an analog fashion.

In an article in today’s TechDirt, Glyn Moody reports on a recent incident where a statistician attempted to use content mining techniques to advance his work, which involves improving detecting data fabrication – a legitimate and valuable academic pursuit.

The researcher, who works at an institution with a subscription to Elsevier’s ScienceDirect database, notes that he took care to conduct the necessary bulk downloading of articles from Elsevier’s database in a manner that would not disrupt other users.

Nevertheless, Moody reports that Elsevier contacted the researcher and instructed him to stop. The research notes that:

“Approximately two weeks after I started downloading psychology research papers, Elsevier notified my university that this was a violation of the access contract, that this could be considered stealing of content, and that they wanted it to stop. My librarian explicitly instructed me to stop downloading (which I did immediately), otherwise Elsevier would cut all access to Sciencedirect for my university.”

To be fair, Elsevier does appear to have indicated to the researcher that he could use an Elsevier-provided API to continue to content mine articles.  However, the researcher notes that the Elsevier API often returns only metadata to the user – rather than the full text that is so valuable, and that can be easily accessed by the user via the Web, making it a far less desirable option.

Elsevier’s response is troubling for a number of reasons. Using the threat of cutting off institution-wide paid access to ScienceDirect in response to a researcher’s legitimate use of content is extreme. Requiring researchers to use only Elsevier-approved tools to work on articles in an Elsevier-controlled environment is behavior that runs directly counter to promoting an open scholarly environment. And, perhaps the most troubling of all, is referring to the downloading of articles from an institution with a legitimate subscription to the content as “stealing”. The tragedy of Aaron Swartz starkly illustrated the folly of this kind of thinking.

In an era when many commercial publishers insist on selling our institutions access to digital articles only in large bundles, touting the benefits of these bundles as “databases,” restricting the rights of users to fully use these databases is unacceptable. As Peter Murray-Rust and his team at Content Mine so eloquently note:

“The Right to Read is the Right to Mine. Anyone who has lawful access to read the literature with their eyes should be able to do so with a machine. We want to make this right a reality and enable everyone to perform research using humanity’s accumulated scientific knowledge.”

Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

How digital ‘tree of life’ embodies the potential of open science

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


Scientists have developed a comprehensive, open map of the relationships among all known life. The project illustrates how open-science principles and digital technology can bring together information to expand understanding of a complex subject.

Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

Senate panel passes bill to give public access to more research

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


A Senate panel on Wednesday passed legislation to require certain federally funded research to be open to the public.

Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Public Access Plan to Use PMC Platform for Articles

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


Yesterday, during the annual meeting of the NIH PubMed Central (PMC) National Advisory Committee, NIH staff noted that they were working to include Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-funded articles into the PMC database. It turns out that very quietly, in early March, the VA released its plan for policies ensuring public access to articles and data resulting from its funded research, as required by the February 2013 White House directive. The plan provides mechanisms for the agency to broadly share articles and research data while fully respecting the Agency’s ethical and legal obligations to safeguard the privacy of veterans and other VA research subjects.

VA Plan for Articles: Partner with NIH’s PubMed Central

The VA’s public access plan calls for the agency to partner with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to use PubMed Central (PMC) as the repository for articles. The plan calls PMC “a firmly established public-private partnership…that ensures that members of the public can read, download, and analyze final manuscripts or final published documents in digital form.”

The agency also notes that it was critical to them that the use of PMC also ensures that texts and their associated content will be stored in nonproprietary and/or widely-distributed archival, machine readable formats; provide access to persons with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; and enables interoperability with other Federal public access archival solutions and other appropriate archives.

All VA-funded researchers will be required to deposit their final peer-reviewed manuscripts into PMC upon acceptance in a peer-reviewed journal and make them available to the public with no longer than a 12-month embargo period. VA will also accept final published articles where allowed and will follow the NIH’s current format requirements.

Interestingly, unlike other agencies, the VA plan does contain a specific clause addressing the OSTP requirement that agencies provide stakeholders with a mechanism for petitioning the agency to “shorten or extend the allowable embargo period.” Presumably, the VA will follow the guidance that the NIH has established on this point, allowing stakeholders and funded researchers to provide data indicating how the public’s interest can be better served by changing the embargo period for their specific research.

The VA will also presumably follow the NIH’s current rules on reuse rights for articles in the PMC database, putting the onus on authors to ensure that they have secured sufficient rights to deposit articles, and limiting reuse rights to the bulk of the PMC collection to only those currently allowed under Fair Use.

Finally, the VA indicates that they will provide a system to monitor compliance with the new policy over time, using data from PubMed Central and other sources.

This policy will be effective for articles resulting from research funded by the VA Office of Research and Development on October 1, 2015, and for articles resulting from research funded by Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Offices on December 31, 2015.

VA Plan for Research Data: A Phased Approach

The VA’s plan for research data calls for all investigators requesting funding to submit a Data Management Plan (DMP) outlining plans for managing and providing access to research data, or else provide a rationale as to why their research can not be made available. This puts the VA in line with all other agencies who are using DMP’s to effectively set the default mode for all VA-generated research data to “open.”

What sets the VA’s plan apart from that of many other agencies is their explicit discussion of the need to balance safeguarding the privacy of Veterans with the mandate to develop public access data systems. Consequently, the VA will pursue a staged approach over a period of several years that will simultaneously advance three specific, fundamental goals:

  1. Making VA research data available to the public with the fewest constraints possible.
  2. Protecting the privacy of Veterans and meeting VA’s obligation to maintain confidentiality and security of health records, and associated personal information.
  3. Utilizing data sharing mechanisms that can be implemented at reasonable cost.

Taking this approach means that the VA will take a phased approach to both the way research data is shared with the public, as well as the kind of data that is shared. The VA will start by sharing digital data from VA-funded research through controlled public access mechanisms (i.e., through data use agreements (DUAs) and other written agreements) and move as expeditiously as possible toward fully open public access mechanisms that ensure the protection of Veterans’ identifiable private information.

To facilitate a move towards full open data sharing, the VA will enlist federal and non-federal experts to develop an assessment of privacy risks associated with matching of “de-identified” health information with both publically available and readily available private databases. This work is expected to be complete by September 31, 2016.

In terms of the specifics of what research data is to be shared, all VA-funded researchers will ultimately be required to share all digital data underlying the published results from all VA funded research. This policy will go into effect October 1, 2015 for all VA Office of Research and Development-funded research, and on December 31, 2015 for research funded by Veterans Health Administration Program Offices. Expansion of the policy to other categories of data will be considered upon the completion of privacy assessment described above.

Perhaps to be expected given the nature of the data generated by the agency’s research, the VA plan provides a more detailed blueprint for agency-maintained data repositories. The VA has concluded an initial research data inventory, and found that it currently holds 1.5 petabytes of research in online locations, as well as 4-6 petabytes of research data stored offline on media such as tapes, CD/DVD’s, hard drives, thumb drives. etc. The agency also expects to generate an additional 500-700 terabytes of new data annually.

As a result, the VA tasked a team to explore the costs and features needed to leverage its existing data infrastructure to house all research data. The team recommended developing a solution architecture comprised of more than 30 local research systems to service the application, database, and storage needs of active research studies, and centralized repository resources to provide retention and cataloging of all completed studies

Finally, the VA joins the majority of the other U.S. agencies in noting that the Department will explore the development of a “research data commons” along with other departments and agencies, for storage, discoverability, and reuse of data with a particular focus on making the data underlying peer reviewed scientific publications resulting from federally funded scientific research available for free at the time of publication. They also note that they will work to adhere to the FAIR (Find, Access, Interoperate and Reuse) principles of data sharing in any environment that they participate in.

Thursday, January 1, 1970       Events

OpenCon 2015 Applications are Open!

  ·   Open Access   ·   Open Data   ·   Open Education

Date

Thursday, January 1st, 1970


Applications to attend OpenCon 2015 on November 14-16 in Brussels, Belgium are now open! The application is available on the OpenCon website at opencon2015.org/attend and includes the opportunity to apply for a travel scholarship to cover the cost of travel and accommodations. Applications will close on June 22nd at 11:59pm PDT.

http://www.opencon2015.org/blog_opencon-2015-applications-are-open

Saturday, November 15, 2014 - Tuesday, November 17, 2015       Events

OpenCon 2014

October 15-17, 2014  ·  American University Open Access   ·   Open Data   ·   Open Education

OpenCon 2014 will bring together students and early career researchers from across the world to learn about the issues, develop critical skills, and return home ready to catalyze action toward a more open system for sharing the world’s information — from scholarly and scientific research, to educational materials, to digital data.

Location

Washington, DC

Date

Saturday, November 15th, 2014

Time

October 15-17, 2014


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                               Contact:    Ranit Schmelzer
May 28, 2014                                                                                                                 202.538.1065
[email protected]

OpenCon_A_transparent_600

Broad Coalition Announces Student and Early Career Researcher Conference on Open Access, Open Education and Open Data
OpenCon 2014 to Take Place November 15-17 in Washington, DC

WASHINGTON, DC — Today 11 organizations representing the next generation of scholars and researchers announced OpenCon 2014: the Student and Early Career Researcher Conference on Open Access, Open Education and Open Data. Slated for November 15-17 in Washington, DC, the event will bring together students and early career researchers from across the world to learn about the issues, develop critical skills, and return home ready to catalyze action toward a more open system for sharing the world’s information — from scholarly and scientific research, to educational materials, to digital data.

“From Nigeria to Norway, the next generation is beginning to take ownership of the system of scholarly communication which they will inherit,” said Nick Shockey, founding Director of the Right to Research Coalition. “OpenCon 2014 will support and accelerate this rapidly growing movement of students and early career researchers advocating for openness in research literature, education, and data.”

The first event of its kind, OpenCon 2014 builds on the success of the Berlin 11 Satellite Conference for Students and Early Stage Researchers, which brought together more than 70 participants from 35 countries to engage on Open Access to scientific and scholarly research. The interest, energy, and passion from the student and researcher participants and the Open Access movement leaders who attended made a clear case for expanding the event in size and duration, and to broaden the scope to related areas of the Openness movement.

“To be successful, our community must put the next generation at the core of what we do to promote openness in research outputs,” said Heather Joseph, Executive Director of SPARC (The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition). “We are eager to partner with others in the community to support and catalyze student and early career researcher involvement across the Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data movements through the OpenCon meeting.”

OpenCon 2014’s three day program will begin with two days of conference-style keynotes, panels, and interactive workshops, drawing both on the expertise of leaders in the Open Access, Open Education and Open Data movements and the experience of participants who have already led successful projects. The third day will take advantage of the Washington DC location by providing a half-day of advocacy training followed by the opportunity for in-person meetings with relevant policymakers, ranging from members of the U.S. Congress to representatives from national embassies and key NGOs. Participants will leave with a deeper understanding of the conference’s three issue areas, stronger skills in organizing local and national projects, and connections with policymakers and prominent leaders across the three issue areas.

“Open Access to educational materials and the results of research is critically important to medical students’ ability to get a research-based education and to put that education into practice after graduation,” said Joško Miše, President of the International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations.  “Around the world, our members have led efforts on these topics, from changing policy at the institutional and national levels to country-wide awareness raising efforts.”

OpenCon 2014 is organized by the Right to Research CoalitionSPARC (The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition), and a committee of student and early career researcher organizations from around the world. A variety of sponsorship opportunities are available and will be critical to ensuring that dedicated students and early career researchers across the globe are able to attend. For more information, see righttoresearch.org/act/opencon/sponsor.

The event will take place back to back with the 2014 Open Education Conference, a large international meeting that will convene leaders from the Open Education movement in Washington, DC on November 19-21.

Applications for OpenCon 2014 will open in August. For more information about the conference and to sign up for updates, visit righttoresearch.org/act/opencon. You can also follow OpenCon 2014 on Twitter at @Open_Con.

###

The Right to Research Coalition is an international alliance of graduate and undergraduate student organizations, which collectively represent nearly 7 million students in over 100 countries around the world, that advocate for and educate students about open methods of scholarly publishing.  The Right to Research Coalition is supported by SPARC.

SPARC®, the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, is an international alliance of academic and research libraries working to correct imbalances in the scholarly publishing system.  Developed by the Association of Research Libraries, SPARC has become a catalyst for change.  Its pragmatic focus is to stimulate the emergence of new scholarly communication models that expand the dissemination of scholarly research and reduce financial pressures on libraries.  More information can be found at www.arl.org/sparc and on Twitter @SPARC_NA.

Contacts for organizing committee members

The American Medical Student Association
Britani Kessler, President
pres [at] amsa [dot] org

Asia-Pacific Alliance of Postgraduate Student Associations
Jianzhen Liu, Director of International Liaison
Jaysonzliu [at] gmail [dot] com
Siyang Xu, Convener of General Assembly
Caymanhsu [at] gmail [dot] com

The European Council of Doctoral Candidates and Junior Researchers
Slobodan Radicev, Open Access Working Group Coordinator
radicev [at] uns.ac.rs

The European Federation of Psychology Student Associations
Mariyan Vasev, President
president [at] efpsa [dot] org

The International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations
Ivana Di Salvo, Liaison Officer to Research and Medical Associations
lorma [at] ifmsa [dot] org

Max Planck PhDnet
Prateek Mahalwar, Biology and Medicine section representative
prateek.mahalwar [at] tuebingen.mpg.de

The Medical Students’ Association of Kenya
Daniel Mutonga, Past President
danielmutonga [at] gmail [dot] com 

Medsin-UK
Felicia Yeung, Director of Branch Affairs
branches [at] medsin [dot] org

The National Association of Graduate-Professional Students
Neleen Leslie, President
president [at] nagps [dot] org

The Open Access Button
Joseph McArthur, Co-lead
joseph.mcarthur.10 [at] gmail [dot] com

The Student Public Interest Research Groups
Nick Jermer, NJPIRG Board Chairman
nickjermer [at] gmail [dot] com

Learn more about our work